ISBE due-process decision · FY 2010

Illinois due-process decision 2009-0392: split decision

The father of an adult student with an emotional disability sought reimbursement for an out-of-state residential placement, citing delayed evaluation and an inadequate IEP. The hearing officer found the IEP denied FAPE but held the residential school inappropriate and too restrictive, denying reimbursement.

Outcome: Split decisionDisability: Emotional DisabilityHearing officer:  Full decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
Private/residential placement & reimbursementFAPE denialPlacement/LRE
Relief ordered
None; tuition, room and board reimbursement denied.
From the decision
The Hearing Officer finds that the March 13, 2009 IEP failed to provide

This outcome label is a close call; read the decision's order for the full picture.

ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The parent alleged the district failed to timely identify dyslexia, provide evidence-based reading instruction, consider independent…
District prevailed The self-represented parents argued a separate day school was not the student's least restrictive environment. The hearing officer found…
Split decision The parent alleged the district failed to identify autism, provided inadequate programming and behavior supports, and ignored clinicians'…
Case 2009-0369All decisionsCase 2009-0431