ISBE due-process decision · FY 2009

Illinois due-process decision 2008-0325: district prevailed

The parents of a preschooler with a feeding disorder challenged an earlier ineligibility finding and sought feeding and nutrition therapy. The hearing officer upheld the eligibility decision and IEP, found the therapies not educationally required, and denied evaluation reimbursement.

Outcome: District prevailedDisability: Developmental DelayHearing officer:  Full decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
Eligibility/evaluation/child findRelated servicesIEP adequacy/implementationPlacement/LREIndependent educational evaluation (IEE)
Relief ordered
None
From the decision
The District is not required to provide speech feeding and nutrition services to the Student
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The district filed to defend its reevaluation after the parent requested IEEs in several areas, including autism. The hearing officer…
District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
District prevailed The district filed to defend its supplemental assessments, including an FBA and rating scales, after the pro se parent requested several…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The self-represented parent alleged the district failed to implement the transfer student's IEP and improperly required a pre-start…
Case 2008-0247All decisionsCase 2008-0376