ISBE due-process decision · FY 2010

Illinois due-process decision 2008-0366: split decision

The parent alleged inadequate evaluation, programming and assistive technology, and sought IEE funding and appropriate placement. The hearing officer found a denial of FAPE, ordered unpaid IEEs paid and compensatory services, but denied residential placement and declined to reach the earlier withdrawn IEE complaint.

Outcome: Split decisionDisability: Intellectual DisabilityHearing officer: W. David UtleyFull decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
FAPE denialIndependent educational evaluation (IEE)Compensatory educationPrivate/residential placement & reimbursementRelated services
Relief ordered
Payment of unpaid IEEs, IEP implementing evaluator recommendations, two years compensatory speech and OT. Residential placement denied.
From the decision
Residential Placement is Denied.
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The district filed to defend its reevaluation after the parent requested IEEs in several areas, including autism. The hearing officer…
District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
District prevailed The district filed to defend its supplemental assessments, including an FBA and rating scales, after the pro se parent requested several…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
Split decision The parents alleged the IEP's speech minutes were insufficient and the district missed five months of required speech services; the…
Case 2008-0362All decisionsCase 2008-0499