ISBE due-process decision · FY 2010

Illinois due-process decision 2008-0362: parent prevailed

The parents alleged inadequate services, assistive technology, IEP and placement for a student nearing age 22. The hearing officer found procedural and substantive denials of FAPE, adopted the recommended ABA program placement and ordered two years of compensatory services, rejecting some minor procedural claims.

Outcome: Parent prevailedDisability: Multiple DisabilitiesHearing officer:  Full decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
FAPE denialRelated servicesProcedural/parent-participationPlacement/LRECompensatory education
Relief ordered
ABA program placement, reevaluation, AT evaluation, new IEP, two years of compensatory services.
From the decision
The District must provide two years of compensatory services
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The self-represented parent alleged the district failed to implement the transfer student's IEP and improperly required a pre-start…
District prevailed The self-represented parents challenged the district's executive functioning services, implementation of IEP goals and accommodations…
Split decision The parents alleged the IEP's speech minutes were insufficient and the district missed five months of required speech services; the…
Case 2008-0342All decisionsCase 2008-0366