ISBE due-process decision · FY 2010

Illinois due-process decision 2009-0160: district prevailed

The parents unilaterally placed the student in a private special education day school and sought reimbursement, prospective placement, a compensatory year, and stay-put status there. The hearing officer found the district's IEPs provided FAPE in the least restrictive environment and denied all requests.

Outcome: District prevailedDisability: Multiple DisabilitiesHearing officer:  Full decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
FAPE denialPrivate/residential placement & reimbursementPlacement/LRECompensatory educationOther
Relief ordered
None; stay-put remains the district's resource program.
From the decision
The district need take no further action with respect to this matter.
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
Split decision The parents alleged the IEP's speech minutes were insufficient and the district missed five months of required speech services; the…
District prevailed The parent alleged the district failed to timely identify dyslexia, provide evidence-based reading instruction, consider independent…
District prevailed The self-represented parents argued a separate day school was not the student's least restrictive environment. The hearing officer found…
Case 2009-0035All decisionsCase 2009-0206