ISBE due-process decision · FY 2010

Illinois due-process decision 2010-0005: parent prevailed

The parents rejected the district's proposed multi-disability self-contained placement and sought funding of their home-based ABA program. The hearing officer found the district's placement inappropriate and the home program appropriate, ordering the district to fund it for the school year.

Outcome: Parent prevailedDisability: AutismHearing officer:  Full decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
Placement/LREPrivate/residential placement & reimbursementFAPE denial
Relief ordered
District to fund the home-based program ($95,000) for the school year including ESY, plus two hours weekly of supervised peer-interaction opportunities.
From the decision
The Parents' request for funding of their home based program is granted in the amount of ninety-five thousand dollars
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The parent alleged the district failed to timely identify dyslexia, provide evidence-based reading instruction, consider independent…
District prevailed The self-represented parents argued a separate day school was not the student's least restrictive environment. The hearing officer found…
Split decision The parent alleged the district failed to identify autism, provided inadequate programming and behavior supports, and ignored clinicians'…
Case 2009-0478All decisionsCase 2010-0029