ISBE due-process decision · FY 2012

Illinois due-process decision 2012-0126: district prevailed

After a disciplinary incident, the parent alleged procedural violations around a proposed placement change; the district cross-filed seeking a ruling that a private therapeutic day school was the LRE. The hearing officer found no proven violations and agreed with the district on placement.

Outcome: District prevailedDisability: Other Health ImpairmentHearing officer:  Full decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
Both the parent and the district
Issues in dispute
Procedural/parent-participationPlacement/LREBehavior/discipline/manifestation
Relief ordered
None for the parent; district's proposed private therapeutic day school found to be the LRE.
From the decision
the LRE for the Student is a private therapeutic day
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The self-represented parent alleged the district failed to implement the transfer student's IEP and improperly required a pre-start…
District prevailed The self-represented parents challenged the district's executive functioning services, implementation of IEP goals and accommodations…
District prevailed The self-represented parents argued a separate day school was not the student's least restrictive environment. The hearing officer found…
Case 2012-0121All decisionsCase 2012-0138