ISBE due-process decision · FY 2026

Illinois due-process decision 2025-0204: district prevailed

The self-represented parents challenged the district's executive functioning services, implementation of IEP goals and accommodations, removal of a safety plan and scheduled breaks, and prior written notice. The hearing officer found the IEP reasonably calculated to provide FAPE and notice adequate, and denied all claims.

Outcome: District prevailedDisability: Other Health ImpairmentHearing officer: Leah TrinkalaFull decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
IEP adequacy/implementationProcedural/parent-participationEligibility/evaluation/child find
Relief ordered
None.
From the decision
The Parents' claims and requested relief are hereby denied.
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The district filed to defend its reevaluation after the parent requested IEEs in several areas, including autism. The hearing officer…
District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
District prevailed The district filed to defend its supplemental assessments, including an FBA and rating scales, after the pro se parent requested several…
District prevailed The self-represented parent alleged the district failed to implement the transfer student's IEP and improperly required a pre-start…
Split decision The parents alleged the IEP's speech minutes were insufficient and the district missed five months of required speech services; the…
District prevailed The parent alleged the district failed to timely identify dyslexia, provide evidence-based reading instruction, consider independent…
Case 2025-0103All decisionsCase 2025-0244