ISBE due-process decision · FY 2012

Illinois due-process decision 2012-0223: split decision

In a bifurcated hearing on the parent's request for six IEEs at public expense, the hearing officer upheld the district's evaluations in four areas and transition planning, but ruled for the parent on assistive technology and vision. Other issues were set for a later hearing.

Outcome: Split decisionDisability: Emotional DisabilityHearing officer:  Full decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
Independent educational evaluation (IEE)Eligibility/evaluation/child findTransition/secondary services
Relief ordered
District AT and vision assessments with IEP meeting; one-third of the parent's expert witness costs; other IEE requests denied.
From the decision
The ruling is split (though not evenly) between a finding in part for the District and a finding in part for the Parent.
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The district filed to defend its reevaluation after the parent requested IEEs in several areas, including autism. The hearing officer…
District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
District prevailed The district filed to defend its supplemental assessments, including an FBA and rating scales, after the pro se parent requested several…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The self-represented parent alleged the district failed to implement the transfer student's IEP and improperly required a pre-start…
District prevailed The self-represented parents challenged the district's executive functioning services, implementation of IEP goals and accommodations…
Case 2012-0138All decisionsCase 2012-0234