ISBE due-process decision · FY 2014

Illinois due-process decision 2013-0468: parent prevailed

The parents challenged the manifestation determination, the student's expulsion, and the lack of special education services during the expulsion. The hearing officer ruled for the parents on all three issues, ordering reinstatement, IEP implementation with a new FBA/BIP, and compensatory tutoring.

Outcome: Parent prevailedDisability: Specific Learning DisabilityHearing officer:  Full decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
Behavior/discipline/manifestationFAPE denialCompensatory education
Relief ordered
Reinstatement; prior IEP implemented with added FBA/BIP; 30 hours of one-to-one compensatory tutoring.
From the decision
the IHO awards the Student 30 hours of compensatory education.
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
Split decision The parents alleged the IEP's speech minutes were insufficient and the district missed five months of required speech services; the…
District prevailed The parent alleged the district failed to timely identify dyslexia, provide evidence-based reading instruction, consider independent…
District prevailed The self-represented parents argued a separate day school was not the student's least restrictive environment. The hearing officer found…
Case 2013-0447All decisionsCase 2013-0470