ISBE due-process decision · FY 2015

Illinois due-process decision 2014-0511: parent prevailed

The parent challenged a new district's proposed placement for a student with severe disabilities and sought continued placement at the prior therapeutic day school with tuition reimbursement. The hearing officer found the proposed placement inappropriate and ordered continued placement and reimbursement, including ESY.

Outcome: Parent prevailedDisability: Intellectual DisabilityHearing officer: W. David UtleyFull decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
Placement/LREPrivate/residential placement & reimbursementExtended school year (ESY)
Relief ordered
Continued day school placement for the school year and ESY; reimbursement of tuition and ESY costs.
From the decision
This matter is found in favor of the Parent.
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The parent alleged the district failed to timely identify dyslexia, provide evidence-based reading instruction, consider independent…
District prevailed The self-represented parents argued a separate day school was not the student's least restrictive environment. The hearing officer found…
Split decision The parent alleged the district failed to identify autism, provided inadequate programming and behavior supports, and ignored clinicians'…
Case 2014-0396All decisionsCase 2015-0045