ISBE due-process decision · FY 2018

Illinois due-process decision 2017-0241: split decision

The parents challenged evaluations, IEPs, service implementation and procedures; the district filed to defend its evaluations. The hearing officer ruled mostly for the parents, ordering private placement, extensive compensatory services and reimbursements, while ruling for the district on parts of the evaluation and speech-service claims.

Outcome: Split decisionDisability: Specific Learning DisabilityHearing officer: Jennifer LeisnerFull decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
Both the parent and the district
Issues in dispute
Eligibility/evaluation/child findIEP adequacy/implementationCompensatory educationPrivate/residential placement & reimbursementProcedural/parent-participation
Relief ordered
Evaluation and tuition reimbursement; private placement through 2017-18; autism and CAPD added; extensive compensatory therapy and tutoring.
From the decision
Finding: For the Parents in Part and for the School District in Part.
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The district filed to defend its reevaluation after the parent requested IEEs in several areas, including autism. The hearing officer…
District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
District prevailed The district filed to defend its supplemental assessments, including an FBA and rating scales, after the pro se parent requested several…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The self-represented parent alleged the district failed to implement the transfer student's IEP and improperly required a pre-start…
Case 2017-0225All decisionsCase 2017-0282