ISBE due-process decision · FY 2025

Illinois due-process decision 2024-0228: district prevailed

The pro se parent sought to keep the student at his current private therapeutic day school after the district decided to change the site for his IEP. The hearing officer found no meaningful progress there and allowed a move to another therapeutic day school.

Outcome: District prevailedDisability: Emotional DisabilityHearing officer: Janet Maxwell-WickettFull decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
Placement/LREIEP adequacy/implementation
Relief ordered
None for parent; district permitted to place student at an alternate therapeutic day school and parent ordered to cooperate.
From the decision
Parent's requested relief to maintain the Student in his current therapeutic day school, FS, is hereby denied.
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The self-represented parent alleged the district failed to implement the transfer student's IEP and improperly required a pre-start…
District prevailed The self-represented parents challenged the district's executive functioning services, implementation of IEP goals and accommodations…
Split decision The parents alleged the IEP's speech minutes were insufficient and the district missed five months of required speech services; the…
Case 2024-0227All decisionsCase 2024-0237