ISBE due-process decision · FY 2008

Illinois due-process decision 2008-0046: district prevailed

Both parties filed over the student's placement; the parents sought a regular classroom and reimbursement for a unilateral private placement. The hearing officer found the district's IEPs provided FAPE, upheld a therapeutic day placement and denied reimbursement.

Outcome: District prevailedDisability: Specific Learning DisabilityHearing officer:  Full decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
Both the parent and the district
Issues in dispute
Placement/LREIEP adequacy/implementationPrivate/residential placement & reimbursementFAPE denial
Relief ordered
None to parents; therapeutic day placement upheld and reimbursement denied.
From the decision
any claim for reimbursement for a unilateral placement shall be denied pursuant to 34 CFR §300.148
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The self-represented parent alleged the district failed to implement the transfer student's IEP and improperly required a pre-start…
District prevailed The self-represented parents challenged the district's executive functioning services, implementation of IEP goals and accommodations…
Split decision The parents alleged the IEP's speech minutes were insufficient and the district missed five months of required speech services; the…
Case 2008-0040All decisionsCase 2008-0052