ISBE due-process decision · FY 2008

Illinois due-process decision 2008-0127: district prevailed

The parent challenged the district's proposal to move the student from a self-contained class to a separate public special education day school. The hearing officer found the student was not progressing and was disruptive, and ordered the day school placement implemented.

Outcome: District prevailedDisability: Emotional DisabilityHearing officer:  Full decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
Placement/LREBehavior/discipline/manifestation
Relief ordered
District to implement IEP at separate special education day school.
From the decision
the district shall implement the October 2, 2007 IEP and place the student at the special education day-school
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The self-represented parents argued a separate day school was not the student's least restrictive environment. The hearing officer found…
Parent prevailed In an expedited hearing after the student's expulsion for bringing a pocketknife, the parents challenged the manifestation determination…
District prevailed The pro se parent sought to keep the student at his current private therapeutic day school after the district decided to change the site…
Case 2008-0124All decisionsCase 2008-0136