ISBE due-process decision · FY 2010

Illinois due-process decision 2009-0227: split decision

The parents sought reimbursement for a unilateral private placement and prospective placement there, challenging the district's proposed program and placement process. The hearing officer found the IEP offered FAPE and denied reimbursement, but ordered a 1:1 aide and inclusion consultant if the student re-enrolls.

Outcome: Split decisionDisability: Developmental DelayHearing officer:  Full decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
Private/residential placement & reimbursementPlacement/LREProcedural/parent-participationIEP adequacy/implementation
Relief ordered
If re-enrolled, IEP implemented with a full-day 1:1 aide and 30 minutes weekly inclusion consultation; reimbursement and private placement denied.
From the decision
the IEP drafted on February 13, 2008 shall be implemented with the additional provision of a one-to-one aide

This outcome label is a close call; read the decision's order for the full picture.

ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The self-represented parent alleged the district failed to implement the transfer student's IEP and improperly required a pre-start…
District prevailed The self-represented parents challenged the district's executive functioning services, implementation of IEP goals and accommodations…
Split decision The parents alleged the IEP's speech minutes were insufficient and the district missed five months of required speech services; the…
Case 2009-0223All decisionsCase 2009-0296