ISBE due-process decision · FY 2010

Illinois due-process decision 2010-0158: district prevailed

A pro se parent challenged the IEP team's move of the student from a self-contained class to a therapeutic day school. The hearing officer found the student was not progressing and posed safety risks, and upheld the therapeutic day school as the least restrictive environment.

Outcome: District prevailedDisability: Emotional DisabilityHearing officer:  Full decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
Placement/LRE
Relief ordered
None; district to give the parent a list of therapeutic day schools and help arrange visits.
From the decision
The District's request for a finding that a therapeutic day school is [the Student's] least restrictive environment is granted.
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The self-represented parents argued a separate day school was not the student's least restrictive environment. The hearing officer found…
District prevailed The pro se parent sought to keep the student at his current private therapeutic day school after the district decided to change the site…
Split decision Seeking a mutually agreeable therapeutic day school, the parents challenged how the district was locating a private day school. The…
Case 2010-0144All decisionsCase 2010-0171