ISBE due-process decision · FY 2011

Illinois due-process decision 2010-0234: split decision

The district filed to contest an IEE request and the parents counter-filed over eligibility and evaluation requests. The hearing officer ordered the student found eligible with a hearing impairment and an IEP developed, but denied IEE reimbursement and the parents' procedural claims.

Outcome: Split decisionDisability: Hearing ImpairmentHearing officer: Mary SchwartzFull decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
Both the parent and the district
Issues in dispute
Independent educational evaluation (IEE)Eligibility/evaluation/child findProcedural/parent-participationFAPE denial
Relief ordered
IEP meeting to find eligibility for hearing impairment, IEP with specified accommodations and math assessment. Evaluation reimbursements denied.
From the decision
The parents' requests for reimbursement are denied.
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The district filed to defend its reevaluation after the parent requested IEEs in several areas, including autism. The hearing officer…
District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
District prevailed The district filed to defend its supplemental assessments, including an FBA and rating scales, after the pro se parent requested several…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The self-represented parent alleged the district failed to implement the transfer student's IEP and improperly required a pre-start…
District prevailed The self-represented parents challenged the district's executive functioning services, implementation of IEP goals and accommodations…
Case 2010-0129All decisionsCase 2010-0286