ISBE due-process decision · FY 2012

Illinois due-process decision 2011-0094: district prevailed

The guardian challenged the district's move of the student to a more structured behavior program and IEP meeting notice. The hearing officer found the guardian did not meet her burden and upheld the placement, directing an IEP review of speech and counseling needs.

Outcome: District prevailedDisability: Emotional DisabilityHearing officer:  Full decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
Placement/LREProcedural/parent-participation
Relief ordered
Placement upheld; IEP meeting to review speech/language assessment and added social work and counseling for the transition.
From the decision
The hearing officer finds that the Grandparent has not met her Burden of Proving the allegations against the District
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The self-represented parent alleged the district failed to implement the transfer student's IEP and improperly required a pre-start…
District prevailed The self-represented parents challenged the district's executive functioning services, implementation of IEP goals and accommodations…
District prevailed The self-represented parents argued a separate day school was not the student's least restrictive environment. The hearing officer found…
Case 2010-0273All decisionsCase 2011-0276