ISBE due-process decision · FY 2015

Illinois due-process decision 2014-0189: district prevailed

The parents objected to the district's proposed move to an instructional therapeutic day school and alleged inadequate evaluation, IEP and behavior planning. The hearing officer found the district offered FAPE and that the proposed day school was the least restrictive environment.

Outcome: District prevailedDisability: Other Health ImpairmentHearing officer:  Full decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
Placement/LREEligibility/evaluation/child findIEP adequacy/implementationBehavior/discipline/manifestation
Relief ordered
None; request to keep the student in the current classroom denied.
From the decision
The District has met its burden in providing FAPE; the proposed placement meets the IDEA requirements for LRE
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The district filed to defend its reevaluation after the parent requested IEEs in several areas, including autism. The hearing officer…
District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
District prevailed The district filed to defend its supplemental assessments, including an FBA and rating scales, after the pro se parent requested several…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The self-represented parent alleged the district failed to implement the transfer student's IEP and improperly required a pre-start…
Case 2013-0496All decisionsCase 2014-0230