ISBE due-process decision · FY 2015

Illinois due-process decision 2013-0496: district prevailed

The parents challenged the district's proposed move of the student from general education to a special education autism program, and sought staff training. The hearing officer found the proposed program was the least restrictive appropriate placement and ordered the placement change.

Outcome: District prevailedDisability: AutismHearing officer:  Full decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
Placement/LREOther
Relief ordered
Parents ordered to consent to the district's proposed placement; district to maintain its existing autism training program.
From the decision
The Parents shall immediately facilitate and execute the proper forms, including any and all consent forms to change
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The self-represented parents argued a separate day school was not the student's least restrictive environment. The hearing officer found…
District prevailed The pro se parent sought to keep the student at his current private therapeutic day school after the district decided to change the site…
District prevailed The pro se parents challenged the district's decision to graduate the adult student with a regular diploma, arguing she had not met…
Case 2014-0357All decisionsCase 2014-0189