ISBE due-process decision · FY 2017

Illinois due-process decision 2016-0487: district prevailed

The parents sought reimbursement for a unilateral out-of-state residential school. The hearing officer found the district denied FAPE through flawed IEPs and a missed transition meeting, but denied reimbursement because the parents did not prove the private school was appropriate.

Outcome: District prevailedDisability: Specific Learning DisabilityHearing officer: Philip MilskFull decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
Private/residential placement & reimbursementFAPE denialProcedural/parent-participation
Relief ordered
None; tuition reimbursement denied.
From the decision
the Parents request for reimbursement by the School District for tuition and costs... be and is hereby denied.
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The self-represented parent alleged the district failed to implement the transfer student's IEP and improperly required a pre-start…
District prevailed The self-represented parents challenged the district's executive functioning services, implementation of IEP goals and accommodations…
District prevailed The parent alleged the district failed to timely identify dyslexia, provide evidence-based reading instruction, consider independent…
District prevailed The self-represented parents argued a separate day school was not the student's least restrictive environment. The hearing officer found…
Case 2016-0486All decisionsCase 2017-0123