ISBE due-process decision · FY 2017

Illinois due-process decision 2017-0123: district prevailed

The district filed to defend its reevaluation after the parents requested an independent educational evaluation at public expense. The parents did not participate in prehearing proceedings. The hearing officer found each component of the reevaluation appropriate and denied the IEE request.

Outcome: District prevailedDisability: Speech or Language ImpairmentHearing officer: Mary Jo StruszFull decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The school district
Issues in dispute
Independent educational evaluation (IEE)Eligibility/evaluation/child find
Relief ordered
None; IEE at public expense denied.
From the decision
The Parents' request for an IEE is denied.
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The district filed to defend its reevaluation after the parent requested IEEs in several areas, including autism. The hearing officer…
District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
District prevailed The district filed to defend its supplemental assessments, including an FBA and rating scales, after the pro se parent requested several…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The self-represented parent alleged the district failed to implement the transfer student's IEP and improperly required a pre-start…
District prevailed The self-represented parents challenged the district's executive functioning services, implementation of IEP goals and accommodations…
Case 2016-0487All decisionsCase 2017-0133