ISBE due-process decision · FY 2019

Illinois due-process decision 2018-0277: district prevailed

The parents challenged the student's emergency care plan, paraprofessional support, curriculum modifications, and ESY decisions. The hearing officer found the student made progress and the district provided FAPE at all times, denying compensatory education and all requested relief.

Outcome: District prevailedDisability: AutismHearing officer: Janet Maxwell-WickettFull decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
IEP adequacy/implementationExtended school year (ESY)Compensatory educationFAPE denial
Relief ordered
None
From the decision
Parent’s requested relief is denied and the complaint and amended complaints are dismissed with prejudice.
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The self-represented parent alleged the district failed to implement the transfer student's IEP and improperly required a pre-start…
District prevailed The self-represented parents challenged the district's executive functioning services, implementation of IEP goals and accommodations…
Split decision The parents alleged the IEP's speech minutes were insufficient and the district missed five months of required speech services; the…
Case 2018-0219All decisionsCase 2018-0340