ISBE due-process decision · FY 2019

Illinois due-process decision 2019-0047: district prevailed

The parents challenged a prior IEP and the district's proposal to move the student from a private therapeutic day school to a district high school program. The hearing officer denied claims against the district and found the district program the least restrictive environment.

Outcome: District prevailedDisability: Intellectual DisabilityHearing officer: Alan SchusterFull decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The parent
Issues in dispute
Placement/LREIEP adequacy/implementationProcedural/parent-participation
Relief ordered
Stay-put dissolved; district to implement its IEP in its high school program in fall, hold a transition meeting, and offer wraparound services.
From the decision
Petitioners claims against District and the relief requested are denied
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The self-represented parent alleged the district failed to implement the transfer student's IEP and improperly required a pre-start…
District prevailed The self-represented parents challenged the district's executive functioning services, implementation of IEP goals and accommodations…
Split decision The parents alleged the IEP's speech minutes were insufficient and the district missed five months of required speech services; the…
Case 2018-0504All decisionsCase 2019-0058