ISBE due-process decision · FY 2024

Illinois due-process decision 2024-0015: split decision

The district sought a ruling that its IEP placing the student in a private therapeutic day school provided FAPE, plus an order compelling parental consent to applications. The hearing officer upheld the IEP but found no authority to compel consent, denying that relief.

Outcome: Split decisionDisability: Other Health ImpairmentHearing officer: Mary Jo StruszFull decision (PDF, ISBE)
Filed by
The school district
Issues in dispute
Placement/LREIEP adequacy/implementationProcedural/parent-participation
Relief ordered
IEP found appropriate; district's request to compel parental consent to therapeutic day school applications denied.
From the decision
This Hearing Officer does not have the authority under the IDEA to override the Parent's refusal to provide consent
ISBE removes the district's and student's names from every decision, so this case can't be linked to a specific district. The summary and outcome label were drafted with AI assistance from the decision's full text and checked against its order (how); the decision PDF is the authoritative record. This is not legal advice.

Decisions on similar issues

District prevailed The parent challenged the district's decision that the student no longer qualified for special education, alleging inadequate evaluation…
Parent prevailed The parents alleged the district denied FAPE in the least restrictive environment by failing to provide an appropriate general education…
District prevailed The parent challenged the residential facility the district chose to implement the agreed residential placement, later seeking…
District prevailed The self-represented parent alleged the district failed to implement the transfer student's IEP and improperly required a pre-start…
District prevailed The self-represented parents challenged the district's executive functioning services, implementation of IEP goals and accommodations…
Split decision The parents alleged the IEP's speech minutes were insufficient and the district missed five months of required speech services; the…
Case 2024-0012All decisionsCase 2024-0034