Illinois special-education due-process hearings: who wins, and over what?
Of the 316 Illinois special-education due-process hearing decisions from FY 2008 through FY 2026 that PedsList classified, parents prevailed outright in 20.3% (64), won part of their case in 37.7% (119), and school districts prevailed in 41.8% (132). Parents therefore obtained at least some relief in 57.9% of decided cases.
School districts filed or cross-filed 59 of these hearings (19%), usually to defend an evaluation or a proposed placement. The most common issue was “Placement/LRE” (raised in 154 decisions). Decisions peaked at 44 in FY 2010; FY 2026 has 7 so far, because most disputes now settle through mediation or resolution meetings before a hearing officer rules.
How often do parents win a due-process hearing in Illinois?
Outcome shares are of the 316 classified decisions; 0 decisions (mostly older scanned PDFs) could not be read reliably and are listed below as "Not classified".
Which issues do parents win most often?
| Issue in dispute | Decisions | Parent prevailed | Parent won at least part |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placement/LRE | 154 | 18% | 45% |
| Eligibility/evaluation/child find | 144 | 21% | 65% |
| Compensatory education | 137 | 26% | 80% |
| IEP adequacy/implementation | 128 | 13% | 63% |
| Private/residential placement & reimbursement | 109 | 31% | 72% |
| FAPE denial | 97 | 30% | 71% |
| Procedural/parent-participation | 95 | 13% | 61% |
| Independent educational evaluation (IEE) | 92 | 23% | 73% |
| Related services | 74 | 22% | 73% |
| Behavior/discipline/manifestation | 62 | 21% | 40% |
| Transition/secondary services | 34 | 15% | 82% |
| Extended school year (ESY) | 25 | 12% | 56% |
| Other | 15 | 0% | 40% |
| Bullying/harassment | 7 | 0% | 43% |
A decision can involve several issues, so rows overlap. Some rows, like compensatory education, are remedies that usually come up once a violation is found, so their win rates run higher. Issues raised in fewer than 5 decisions are omitted.
How has the number of hearings changed?
Decisions per state fiscal year (FY 2008–2026).
Which disabilities are most often involved?
What happens at a due-process hearing?
A due process hearing is a formal, court-like hearing before an impartial hearing officer appointed by the Illinois State Board of Education (ISBE). A parent files a written request with the district superintendent within 2 years of when they knew or should have known about the problem. The district must hold a resolution meeting within 15 days, and the hearing officer's final decision is due 45 days after the 30-day resolution period ends. Either side can appeal to court within 120 days after the decision is mailed.
All 316 decisions
| Case | FY | Outcome | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-0399 | 2011 | Parent prevailed | In an expedited hearing, the parent challenged a disciplinary change of placement to in-school suspension and a therapeutic day school after conduct… |
| 2011-0313 | 2011 | District prevailed | The parent sought only an order placing the student in a private therapeutic day school. The hearing officer found the student could be educated in… |
| 2011-0259 | 2011 | Parent prevailed | The parent alleged inadequate assessments, related services, methodology, assistive technology and IEP goals. The hearing officer found a denial of… |
| 2011-0237 | 2011 | Split decision | The guardians sought a regular classroom with a dedicated 1:1 aide and challenged IEP timeliness and evaluation. The hearing officer upheld the… |
| 2011-0209 | 2011 | Parent prevailed | The parent of a functionally illiterate eighth grader challenged evaluation, IEPs, progress reporting, records and placement. The hearing officer… |
| 2011-0177 | 2011 | Parent prevailed | The parent alleged failures in records, evaluation, IEPs, progress reporting, services, assistive technology and discipline procedures; the district… |
| 2011-0176 | 2011 | District prevailed | The parent alleged the IEPs did not challenge the student in reading, writing and spelling, and that the district evaluated without consent. The… |
| 2011-0168 | 2011 | Split decision | The parents alleged inadequate evaluations, IEPs, placement and social work services. The hearing officer found a denial of FAPE and ordered private… |
| 2011-0123 | 2011 | District prevailed | Pro se parents wanted the student to stay at the regular high school rather than move to a cooperative public day school. The hearing officer found… |
| 2011-0104 | 2011 | Parent prevailed | The guardian alleged the district violated child find by not completing a requested evaluation within the required timeline. The hearing officer… |
| 2011-0063 | 2011 | Parent prevailed | The parent and district disagreed on whether a student with post-concussion syndrome should be taught at home or in a school alternative classroom.… |
| 2011-0024 | 2011 | Split decision | The parent sought general education placement with a full-time aide, an AT evaluation and compensatory ABA therapy. The hearing officer denied the… |
| 2010-0512 | 2011 | District prevailed | The parents sought to keep a preschool student with hearing loss in a private program for deaf and hard-of-hearing children and to be reimbursed.… |
| 2010-0498 | 2011 | Split decision | The parents claimed the district delayed evaluating and identifying the student and sought compensatory tutoring. The hearing officer found an… |
| 2010-0429 | 2011 | Split decision | The parent challenged IEP implementation, transition services, testing accommodations and the high school placement, seeking a different school and… |
| 2010-0415 | 2011 | Split decision | The parents challenged three years of IEPs and sought a residential placement at district expense. The hearing officer upheld most IEPs and denied… |
| 2010-0382 | 2011 | Split decision | The district filed to defend its evaluation against the guardian's IEE request. The hearing officer found the district's OT, AT and speech… |
| 2010-0381 | 2011 | Split decision | A pro se parent challenged the district's evaluation, termination of speech therapy and refusal of door-to-door transportation. The hearing officer… |
| 2010-0375 | 2011 | District prevailed | Parents who unilaterally placed the student in a private school sought tuition reimbursement and a compensatory year there, arguing he needed… |
| 2010-0299 | 2011 | Split decision | The parents alleged child find failures, inadequate evaluations and IEPs lacking services. The hearing officer found a denial of FAPE, ordered IEEs… |
| 2010-0286 | 2011 | Parent prevailed | The parent alleged inadequate evaluations, ineffective IEPs and lack of progress, seeking a private learning disabilities school, IEEs and… |
| 2010-0234 | 2011 | Split decision | The district filed to contest an IEE request and the parents counter-filed over eligibility and evaluation requests. The hearing officer ordered the… |
| 2010-0129 | 2011 | District prevailed | On cross motions for summary judgment, the parent argued the district had to enroll the student at the neighborhood high school rather than a… |
| 2009-0501 | 2011 | Split decision | The parent alleged years of inadequate evaluation, delayed eligibility and deficient IEPs. The hearing officer found a denial of FAPE and ordered a… |